Volume 8, Issue 1 , Pages 42-48.e1, January 2010
Citalopram Provides Little or No Benefit in Nondepressed Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome
Background & Aims
Data on the benefit of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) are conflicting. The longitudinal relationship between clinical symptoms and sensitivity to barostat-mediated rectal distension in IBS remains unclear. We assessed the benefit of citalopram and explored the relationships between symptoms, quality of life (QOL), and rectal sensitivity to barostat distension in non-depressed IBS patients.
Methods
Patients from primary, secondary, and tertiary care settings were randomly assigned to receive citalopram (20 mg/day for 4 weeks, then 40 mg/day for 4 weeks) or placebo in a study with double-masking and concealed allocation. Symptoms were assessed weekly, and IBS-QOL and rectal sensation by barostat were assessed at the beginning and end of the study.
Results
Patients receiving citalopram did not achieve a higher rate of adequate relief of IBS symptoms than patients receiving placebo (12/27 [44%] vs 15/27 [56%]; P = .59), regardless of IBS subtype. The odds ratio for weekly response with citalopram vs placebo was 0.80 (95% confidence interval, 0.61–1.04). Improvements in specific symptom and IBS-QOL scores were not superior for citalopram. Changes in IBS-QOL score and pressure eliciting pain showed a modest correlation (r = 0.33; 95% confidence interval, 0.03–0.57), but changes in symptoms and IBS-QOL scores or rectal sensitivity were not correlated substantially.
Conclusions
Citalopram was not superior to placebo in treating non-depressed IBS patients. Changes in symptoms were not substantially correlated with changes in rectal sensation assessed by barostat. Any benefit of citalopram in non-depressed IBS patients is likely to be modest at best.
Abbreviations used in this paper: CI, confidence interval, CONSORT, Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials, IBS, irritable bowel syndrome, QOL, quality of life, SD, standard deviation, SSRI, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor
View this article's video abstract at www.cghjournal.org.
Conflicts of interest The authors disclose the following: Dr Ladabaum is on the Speaker Bureaus of Novartis, Sucampo, and Takeda. The remaining authors disclose no conflicts.
Funding This study was supported by a National Institutes of Health grant M01-RR00079, including a Clinical Associate Physician Award to Dr Ladabaum, National Institutes of Health/National Center for Research Resources (NCRR) University of California, San Francisco-Clinical and Transational Studies Institute (CTSI) grant number UL1 RR024131, and an AGA/Solvay Award for Clinical Research in Irritable Bowel Syndrome/Motility.
PII: S1542-3565(09)00891-X
doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2009.09.008
© 2010 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Volume 8, Issue 1 , Pages 42-48.e1, January 2010


